https://youtu.be/N37Tm4DyvwQ
I think what was most important was combining the facts that matter with dynamic information that investors would want to hear. In the first pitch, I had too many facts and not enough pizzazz. In the second, it got better, based on my feedback. In the third, I tried to perfect things based off the feedback. I used the second video as a springboard.
I mostly improved the facts. Some were not as relevant as I thought (certain demographics numbers). I also tried to be more animated and dynamic.
Andrew,
ReplyDeleteThe link you posted on your blog was unavailable. However as I watched your pitch 2, you did a really good job in explaining your purpose. You were very articulate and delivered your speak at a good pace. I like how you took into consideration of others opinions and displayed more passion. However you did a really good job explaining your target audience and made it clear you know who you are marketing too.
The description that you wrote made me realize that you really put some thought into improving from the past. From how you formatted your third I see that you really thought about what would continue being useful in your third and it probably was easier to say afterwards.
ReplyDelete